Posts Tagged ‘Ground Zero’

The winter 2016 issue of Urban Agenda Magazine had a very interesting article about the then newly completed “Oculus” at Ground Zero. Built in stages, it is NYC’s newest transportation hub, a fact you can really miss if you walk its many confusing passageways. Yes they all lead to the many subway connections (sorry no free transfers) and the NY/NJ Path train but it lacks any of the feel of a train station or airport. White and sterile, when I first visited it I nick named it an inverted whale skeleton. Well the article is this magazine “Inspiration In the Big Apple” goes further with colorful and descriptive phrasing.

The article’s author, Ellen Gilbert gives a good, many paragraph background on the architect Santiago Calarava, but it’s the quotes that produce the phrases that tickled my writer’s funny bone.

Here are some outtakes:

Amy Plitt, writer for nycurbed.com, says “sure to be Instagram catnip” because of its photogenic unique design.

Joan Gonchar, writer for Architectural Digest,is quoted as saying, “this subterranean drama doesn’t translate into coherence above ground.” And goes on to state, “the building which has been likened to everything from a stegosaurus to a porcupine to a Thanksgiving turkey carcass, is ill at ease on its site.”

Calavera is also the architect for the replacement at Ground Zero of the historic St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church that was destroyed on 9/11. Archbishop Demetrios, the primate of the Greek Orthodox Church in America, said in this article that he hoped the nondenominational bereavement center in the church would “project something that will open a window to eternity.”

Whether “catnip” or a “window to eternity”, it’s always refreshing to read an article that has fun with words.

 

After my trip to Ground Zero on Fri 9th I feel this quote about a city half way across the world from here describes accurately what it is like to walk that lower Manhattan area 15 years after 9/11:

“…marked today not so much by the destruction wrought by war but the rampant reconstruction that swallows up the past as wholesale as any bomb.” – Lina Mounzer in her Aramco magazine July/August issue article “Beirut Sounds Like This (a report on Labanese capital’s indie/alt music scene)

Once again that time of year for remembering has come around. We pause from our sadness over hurricane Isaac’s devastation to the Gulf, concerns about presidential politics with its promises, rhetoric and posturing, and the bloody civil war in Syria, to remember 9/11. Can it really be 11 years? And what does this year mean to us, individually and as a Nation? We had our 10th anniversary last year, since then we eliminated Osama Bin Laden, the 9/11 memorial opened, and the first major building on Ground Zero is nearing completion. Those of us who are wordsmiths, image-makers, or grievers of lost ones continue on our paths of trying to insure that this doesn’t just become another day.

But it’s “Patriot Day” after all. 9, 11 are just the digits of the day on the calendar. And what the heck does a patriot day mean? It can mean we support our troops or we are willing to die for our country, or we are just good citizens who salute the flag when it’s displayed. The name has totally wiped out the gory, bloody meaning of that horrible day. And that is the purpose of a “euphemism”, to replace words with ones that have a diminished impact; to, in essence, sanitize or change the meaning. So we can read the names in the morning, feel a bit of sorrow, then go on with the rest of the day: shop, work, go to a movie, or watch that new television show (that doesn’t deal with 9/11).   

Another example of how 9/11 has been “sanitized” is the renaming of the Freedom Tower. That name along with it 1776’ height was to be a subtle way of displaying our patriotism, a sort of “giving the finger” to those who would be thinking about raping this nation again. But, thanks to the world of commerce and the “bottom line” (isn’t there a bottom line to everything today?) it was renamed “One World Trade Center”, which was thought to be a better draw for corporate tenants. (heaven forbid that they would have to realize they were looking out onto sacred ground every time they looked out their windows!)

I even feel that the memorial itself is a visual euphemism for what happened on that site that day. Where are any of the items that would bring us back to the tragedy: The lattice façade, the crossbeam cross, the stairwell that remained standing amidst the rubble? In the original call for design entries, inclusion of such objects was a mandatory part of the design specifications. But now we have waterfalls, trees, and sterile concrete walkways!

Do you know of any other euphemisms surrounding 9/11 or Ground Zero? I would love to hear about them.

For more comments, insights and reactions, read my online WTC Journal , it is my ongoing 11 year collection of essays and poetry and photographs about 9/11 and the rebuilding of Ground Zero.